Thanks Uwe.

I had left time aside today to catch up on some reading, but based on
that treatise, I don't think I'll have to. Even a limited worst-case
analysis of what was intended shows me Infrared sensing is inadequate,
and misleading in the circumstances in which I expect to place myself.
The idea goes back onto the back burner, until another good approach
suggests itself.

It could still be done, I am sure. But the size of the project changes,
and it is certainly out of range for the guys involved.



On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 12:44:48PM -0800, Uwe Zimmermann enlightened us
thusly
> 
>  What I am looking for is reading to check the feasability. I need
> the  freauencies that everything emits. We all enjoy discussing the
> design strategy, but I haven't given out enough info to get much
> help on that.   Where I need the help is a treatment of what
> frequencies things emit  (Particularly people and the sun).
> 
> Hi Declan,
> 
> in optics people rather talk about wavelengths than frequencies,
> because micrometers and nanometers are much easier to grasp than
> terrahertz. Many have already cited the black-body radiation and I
> don't have the time or energy to check the links you already have.
> Some values:
> 
> -for a human body we talk about wavelengths of 5-10um for the peak of
> the emitted thermal radiation, that's in the far infrared
> 
> -for the sun we talk about 0.5um, which is in the yellow part of the
> spectrum
> 
> The problems with far infrared are mainly: - very few detector
> materials are able to "see" these wavelengths.  There have recently
> been progresses with certain semiconductors, such as InAs, InP, PbTe
> which can be used in 2D imaging devices (e.g. FLIR cameras). Silicon,
> germanium, gallium arsenide are all blind in this part of the
> spectrum.  - the refractive index of almost all common materials for
> lenses is too low to be useful - this means it is hard to make
> focusing optics for this wavelength range. Some materials used are
> certain plastics for Fresnel-type lenses, magnesium fluoride and
> germanium.  - The fact that the thermal radiation of a 37 centigrade
> body does not differ too much from a 20 centigrade surrounding makes
> it necessary to cool the whole system - otherwise the thermal
> radiation of the electronics and optics itself will drown your signal!
> 
> Of course if the surrounding on a summer's day is about as warm as the
> human body it will be impossible to detect the human body from its
> thermal signature! And the 37 centigrade only counts for the uncovered
> parts of the body! Even the thinnest layer of clothes is a very
> effective heat shield and the surface of clothes can be assumed to
> have ambient temperature!
> 
> Alternatives to sensitive pn-junctions or PIR detectors are
> thermopiles which consist of several to several hundred of small
> thermocouple junctions connected in series. Combined with good thermal
> shielding and a focusing optical system these appear to give quite a
> good signal.
> 
> The sun. Well the sun is a bright and hot spot in the sky, about half
> an angular degree in diameter. If it happens to be in the direction of
> the sensor, the only chances for you to detect a much cooler human
> being are: - the angular size of the human being might be
> significantly larger - the signal of a moving (living?) human being
> does change faster than the sun - but we are probably talking time
> constants in the order of a few seconds for the necessary filters here
> 
> 
> A great thermal source is the homepage of Omega. They offer a very
> thick "handbook" on temperature measurement technology on their web
> page which is an extraordinary resource - even though it is their own
> product catalog at the same time....  http://www.omega.com/

-- 

        With best Regards,


        Declan Moriarty.
-- 
Author: Declan Moriarty
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB CHIPDIR-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

Reply via email to