Is this being caused by the battery saver setting? If the receiver is asleep it may be a second before it wakes up and opens the squelch.
Try adjusting Basic Settings -> battery saver and see if you notice any difference for the different values. 73 Nick On 04/04/2020 00:30, David wrote: > No repeater, direct. > > David > > On 4/3/2020 11:32 AM, Bill Riess via chirp_users wrote: >> I didn't see if the original message said this was via a repeater or direct. >> If via a repeater, realize some repeaters have a slight delay, especially if >> the carrier is allowed to drop between transmissions and/or it uses PL/DPL. >> Some dual mode repeaters (analog/digital) can exhibit this behavior. Also, >> at least one repeater in my area has a delay (1-2 seconds) on the first >> transmission in a conversation to discourage "pinging" the repeater. >> >> Bill Riess >> [email protected] >> AKA: ([email protected]) >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] >> <[email protected]> On Behalf Of >> [email protected] >> Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2020 14:00 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: chirp_users Digest, Vol 136, Issue 1 >> >> Send chirp_users mailing list submissions to >> [email protected] >> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >> http://intrepid.danplanet.com/mailman/listinfo/chirp_users >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >> [email protected] >> >> You can reach the person managing the list at >> [email protected] >> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than >> "Re: Contents of chirp_users digest..." >> >> >> Today's Topics: >> >> 1. Baofeng UV-5RA...lost first words (Bill Card) >> 2. Re: Baofeng UV-5RA...lost first words (Ray Hutchinson) >> 3. Re: Replying to the list with a new (Dennis Wage) >> 4. Re: Replying to the list with a new (W Paul Mills) >> 5. Re: Replying to the list with a new (David) >> 6. Re: Replying to the list with a new (D.J.J. Ring, Jr.) >> 7. email / forum etiquette (NE1EE - Rich) >> 8. Re: email / forum etiquette (Richard Shaw) >> 9. Re: email / forum etiquette (NE1EE - Rich) >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Message: 1 >> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 12:31:42 -0700 >> From: Bill Card <[email protected]> >> Subject: [chirp_users] Baofeng UV-5RA...lost first words >> To: Post to Chirp Mailing List <[email protected]> >> Message-ID: >> <cadt+llucbhczz1bf67nk2tj7xoyt3xzzszfcxol8hejc4-2...@mail.gmail.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >> >> This is relating to the discussion about... >> >>>> "I am using a UV-5RA and it has about a sec delay before I hear the >> other person talk is this normal or is there a setting someplace that I can >> change? A real pain as it cuts off the other persons one or 2 first words." >> >> I've followed the discussion but haven't seen anyone mention that, if the >> other person in your communication is using VOX, you'll lose the first few >> words of his/her transmission. When I used to use it with CBs on >> motorcycles, we had to blow into the mic, wait a second, then transmit to >> avoid loss of the first few words. >> >> So it might not be your radio at all. >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: >> http://intrepid.danplanet.com/pipermail/chirp_users/attachments/20200331/8ae9763d/attachment-0001.html >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 2 >> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 19:55:29 +0000 (UTC) >> From: Ray Hutchinson <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [chirp_users] Baofeng UV-5RA...lost first words >> To: Post to Chirp Mailing List <[email protected]> >> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >> >> Another thought.? If this phenomenon of missing the first couple of words >> happens when communication with a paticular individual, then perhaps that >> individual is "Quick Keying", or not fully engaging the PTT on their radio >> before speaking.? If this seems to be the case, encourage them to >> consciously be sure they're pressing the PTT and pausing slightly before >> speaking.? This is often a problem with newer or inexperienced operators in >> the Ham world >> 73 de Ray, AE6H, WQXK637 >> On Tuesday, March 31, 2020, 12:33:37 PM PDT, Bill Card >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> This is relating to the discussion about... >>>> "I am using a UV-5RA and it has about a sec delay before I hear the other >>>> person talk is this normal or is there a setting someplace that I can >>>> change? A real pain as it cuts off the other persons one or 2 first words." >> I've followed the discussion but haven't seen anyone mention that, if the >> other person in your communication is using VOX, you'll lose the first few >> words of his/her transmission. When I used to use it with CBs on >> motorcycles, we had to blow into the mic, wait a second, then transmit to >> avoid loss of the first few words. >> So it might not be your radio at >> all._______________________________________________ >> chirp_users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://intrepid.danplanet.com/mailman/listinfo/chirp_users >> This message was sent to Ray at [email protected] To unsubscribe, send an >> email to [email protected] >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: >> http://intrepid.danplanet.com/pipermail/chirp_users/attachments/20200331/8221fcdd/attachment-0001.html >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 3 >> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 15:34:47 -0500 >> From: Dennis Wage <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [chirp_users] Replying to the list with a new >> To: Discussion of CHIRP <[email protected]> >> Message-ID: >> <cae1d062ujsv7m6nw1um5s29k_loz5mdejvryfqawjoxvsnz...@mail.gmail.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >> >> I don't even want to know, why you are trying to reinvent the wheel. >> >> Dennis M. Wage (W9BOQ) >> >> 245 Corum Hill Road >> Castalian Springs, TN 37031 >> (615) 310-4242 Cell >> (615) 562-5128 Home >> http://hammondb3organ.net >> http://overdubs.net >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 10:23 AM NE1EE - Rich <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> David asked if I got a new thread...so I logged into the email package >>> to see. NO...my "new" subject is under a thread of Yaesu FT-7100 >>> Baofeng UV-5RA >>> showing the hijacked message >>> >>> My message appears in the same 5RA thread. >>> I was under the impression that, though the standard called out the >>> use of In-Reply-To, it was rarely used. Not the case here, as the mail >>> package correctly identified the thread. I suppose that has some >>> usefulness, because someone could preserve the thread and change the >>> subject, providing a clue to someone of the thread content. >>> >>> So ... >>> You need to start a new message. >>> Mike, WB4TTZ >>> >>> is entirely correct. I'm glad I ran the test and got the answer to a >>> pending question in my mind, though I didn't know how to find it. >>> Thanks Mike! >>> ~R~ >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> chirp_users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://intrepid.danplanet.com/mailman/listinfo/chirp_users >>> This message was sent to Dennis Wage at [email protected] To >>> unsubscribe, send an email to >>> [email protected] >>> >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: >> http://intrepid.danplanet.com/pipermail/chirp_users/attachments/20200331/f4b8ef6e/attachment-0001.html >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 4 >> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 17:18:27 -0500 >> From: W Paul Mills <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [chirp_users] Replying to the list with a new >> To: [email protected] >> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: >> http://intrepid.danplanet.com/pipermail/chirp_users/attachments/20200331/ae61daa4/attachment-0001.html >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 5 >> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 18:16:03 -0500 >> From: David <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [chirp_users] Replying to the list with a new >> To: [email protected] >> Message-ID: >> <[email protected]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed >> >> Ok another question, >> >> If I am responding to a post do I use "reply" or do I use "reply list"? >> I use Thunderbird for email. >> >> David >> >> On 3/31/2020 10:21 AM, NE1EE - Rich wrote: >>> David asked if I got a new thread...so I logged into the email package >>> to see. NO...my "new" subject is under a thread of Yaesu FT-7100 >>> Baofeng UV-5RA >>> showing the hijacked message >>> >>> My message appears in the same 5RA thread. >>> I was under the impression that, though the standard called out the use of >>> In-Reply-To, it was rarely used. Not the case here, as the mail package >>> correctly identified the thread. I suppose that has some usefulness, >>> because someone could preserve the thread and change the subject, providing >>> a clue to someone of the thread content. >>> >>> So ... >>> You need to start a new message. >>> Mike, WB4TTZ >>> >>> is entirely correct. I'm glad I ran the test and got the answer to a >>> pending question in my mind, though I didn't know how to find it. Thanks >>> Mike! >>> ~R~ >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> chirp_users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://intrepid.danplanet.com/mailman/listinfo/chirp_users >>> This message was sent to Dave at [email protected] To >>> unsubscribe, send an email to >>> [email protected] >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 6 >> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 20:25:05 -0400 >> From: "D.J.J. Ring, Jr." <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [chirp_users] Replying to the list with a new >> To: Discussion of CHIRP <[email protected]> >> Message-ID: >> <cado5rbjfdy7thrdj+yukv-ze2xqtqhjxz2d8znu9mkr+_zs...@mail.gmail.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >> >> David, >> >> Administrators can set the lists up so that replies go to the author, or to >> the list, or both, or "user decides" - moments ago I just set my >> googlegroups list to "user decides" because if I don't set it that way the >> author's email address is hidden - even from me - the list owner! >> >> Email lists are strange. Gmail doesn't send you back your own posts, which >> was the original setting "way" back in 1980s when everyone was on a 300 baud >> modem and phone lines. Conserve valuable bandwidth in those days. Now >> sending you your own message takes a few milliseconds. >> >> I still use mutt and thunderbird, both have "bounce" functions because >> sometimes my list subscribers think they have to send their emails to me for >> forwarding to the list. Bouncing an email makes it look like it was sent by >> the original sender to the final addressee - which in my case is always the >> email list, but it can be abused to fool people, Person A sends me and >> email, I bounce it to Person B and Person B thinks it was sent directly from >> Person A. You can see it came through me if you look at the headers. >> >> I did have my email list set up that way in 1994 when I started that list as >> a "one way" email list. Finally when google announced it was doing free >> lists, I jumped at the chance. I also printed newsletters using a Commodore >> 64 and GeoPublish - wow that's going back some. >> >> 73 >> DR >> N1EA >> >> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 7:16 PM David <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Ok another question, >>> >>> If I am responding to a post do I use "reply" or do I use "reply list"? >>> I use Thunderbird for email. >>> >>> David >>> >>> On 3/31/2020 10:21 AM, NE1EE - Rich wrote: >>>> David asked if I got a new thread...so I logged into the email >>>> package >>> to see. NO...my "new" subject is under a thread of >>>> Yaesu FT-7100 >>>> Baofeng UV-5RA >>>> showing the hijacked message >>>> >>>> My message appears in the same 5RA thread. >>>> I was under the impression that, though the standard called out the >>>> use >>> of In-Reply-To, it was rarely used. Not the case here, as the mail >>> package correctly identified the thread. I suppose that has some >>> usefulness, because someone could preserve the thread and change the >>> subject, providing a clue to someone of the thread content. >>>> So ... >>>> You need to start a new message. >>>> Mike, WB4TTZ >>>> >>>> is entirely correct. I'm glad I ran the test and got the answer to a >>> pending question in my mind, though I didn't know how to find it. >>> Thanks Mike! >>>> ~R~ >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> chirp_users mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://intrepid.danplanet.com/mailman/listinfo/chirp_users >>>> This message was sent to Dave at [email protected] To >>>> unsubscribe, send an email to >>> [email protected] >>> _______________________________________________ >>> chirp_users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://intrepid.danplanet.com/mailman/listinfo/chirp_users >>> This message was sent to D.J.J. Ring, Jr. at [email protected] To >>> unsubscribe, send an email to >>> [email protected] >>> >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: >> http://intrepid.danplanet.com/pipermail/chirp_users/attachments/20200331/bae9c9ea/attachment-0001.html >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 7 >> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 13:17:47 -0400 >> From: NE1EE - Rich <[email protected]> >> Subject: [chirp_users] email / forum etiquette >> To: [email protected] >> Message-ID: >> >> <dm5pr0701mb38138c9c831c5b464f5bf75cf5...@dm5pr0701mb3813.namprd07.prod.outlook.com> >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" >> >> Well, I often see breaches of etiquette. The most serious of these is >> hijacked threads. I find it nearly impossible sometimes to find what I am >> looking for, because a thread with subject A will really be about subject B. >> >> So maybe we could have some sort of monthly reminder email, with >> explanations? >> >> >> >> ~R~ >> 73 de Rich NE1EE >> On the banks of the Piscataqua >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 8 >> Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 09:25:11 -0500 >> From: Richard Shaw <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [chirp_users] email / forum etiquette >> To: Discussion of CHIRP <[email protected]> >> Message-ID: >> <CAN3TeO0PvgqaMjJMhyX7y3XzmeLde5aD=7ZA6Es=gu3un_q...@mail.gmail.com> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >> >> On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 8:50 AM NE1EE - Rich <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> So maybe we could have some sort of monthly reminder email, with >>> explanations? >>> >> A gentile but direct reminder is more effective I think, but it wouldn't >> hurt to reference the full list once a breach is noted (for everyone). >> >> This list seems pretty complete: >> >> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/MailingListEtiquette >> >> Thanks, >> Richard >> -------------- next part -------------- >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >> URL: >> http://intrepid.danplanet.com/pipermail/chirp_users/attachments/20200401/33a7d2fb/attachment-0001.html >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 9 >> Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2020 10:44:29 -0400 >> From: NE1EE - Rich <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [chirp_users] email / forum etiquette >> To: Discussion of CHIRP <[email protected]> >> Message-ID: >> >> <dm5pr0701mb3813eb70eb65b674221bec02f5...@dm5pr0701mb3813.namprd07.prod.outlook.com> >> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" >> >> Gosh! Thanks for being kind about that! I think that I am too outspoken, and >> I actually meant to delete the email. I was momentarily stunned when I saw a >> post with exactly the same subject! >> >> Yes...I like what you have recommended. I used to have a link to something >> similar, but then the web page went away. >> >> Saay...what's up here? I feel cheated <grin> Instructions For Specific >> Clients No Eudora! >> >> Again, thanks for the suggestion. Much appreciated, and I have bookmarked it. >> >> ~Rich~ >> >> On 2020-04-01 09:25:-0500, you wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 8:50 AM NE1EE - Rich >>> <<mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> So maybe we could have some sort of monthly reminder email, with >>> explanations? >>> >>> A gentile but direct reminder is more effective I think, but it wouldn't >>> hurt to reference the full list once a breach is noted (for everyone). >>> >>> This list seems pretty complete: >>> >>> <https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/MailingListEtiquette>https://wiki.open >>> stack.org/wiki/MailingListEtiquette >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Richard >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> chirp_users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://intrepid.danplanet.com/mailman/listinfo/chirp_users >> To unsubscribe, send an email to >> [email protected] >> >> End of chirp_users Digest, Vol 136, Issue 1 >> ******************************************* >> >> _______________________________________________ >> chirp_users mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://intrepid.danplanet.com/mailman/listinfo/chirp_users >> This message was sent to Dave at [email protected] >> To unsubscribe, send an email to >> [email protected] > _______________________________________________ > chirp_users mailing list > [email protected] > http://intrepid.danplanet.com/mailman/listinfo/chirp_users > This message was sent to Nick G4IRX at [email protected] > To unsubscribe, send an email to > [email protected] _______________________________________________ chirp_users mailing list [email protected] http://intrepid.danplanet.com/mailman/listinfo/chirp_users This message was sent to [email protected] at [email protected] To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected]
