Comment #2 on issue 25791 by juhpetersen: x86_64 rpm requires lsb-core-ia32 http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=25791
> We're trying to simplify our package dependencies as much as possible. I dunno, it looks like oversimplifying to me. > It's much easier to just depend on lsb, which sets a base expectation, > rather than list out many individual packages / libraries. I can't really see that: lsb should be stable right and you know what subset of lsb is needed, so why not just list that explicitly, rather than pulling in superfluous dependencies like qt3. How about putting the spec file into svn so people can contribute to it? Anyway I hope the long term chromium goals will lead to webkit and chromium getting into the main distros and built and packaged optimally and natively. :) -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your issue notification preferences at: http://code.google.com/hosting/settings --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Automated mail from issue updates at http://crbug.com/ Subscription options: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-bugs -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
