Comment #59 on issue 5083 by windinyews: High browser process CPU usage  
from Flash on Vista
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=5083

nman985, that's very eloquent.

The only problem is that what you are saying is provably not true.

I have loaded big sets of flash-bearing tabs from nytimes.com newspaper  
pages on
Firefox 3.5, and my cpu usage remains at 6% average.

If I load just a few of the same Flash-bearing NYTimes pages on the very  
latest
Google Chrome, my cpu usage is at or above 80%.

This is a huge difference. I believe it is due to a misconception or  
mismanagement
that Chrome's software does, because it is intent to use multiple processes  
for the
safety sandboxes.

This may or may not be due to issues in the Webkit framework, but either  
way, it is
a problem that we have known how to manage for decades, through use of  
inter-process
communication to assure only visible windows actually process active  
view-changing --
  i.e. the gazoomy eye-noise like the Times favors in its Flash ads.

I would think Google with all their reputation could find one or two  
persons on
staff who can understand and write software at depth, which is what it  
takes to
actually manage what an event-window framework is doing.

I believe it is just a matter of taking the professional pride, and the  
trouble.

Yes, there are other things Google needs to do with Chrome. But those won't  
be
important if we decide not to use it because of this very serious and  
constant,
daily performance headache.

It makes the difference between 2 and 4 hour battery life on a new laptop  
with
excellent power management. You do the math as far as how important that is.

C.



--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may adjust your issue notification preferences at:
http://code.google.com/hosting/settings

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Automated mail from issue updates at http://crbug.com/
Subscription options: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-bugs
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to