On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Mike Morearty <m...@morearty.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 3:54 PM, John Tamplin <j...@google.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 6:37 PM, John Abd-El-Malek <j...@chromium.org>wrote:
>>
>>> For reference, something similar is done for popups:
>>> void NPN_PushPopupsEnabledState(NPP instance, NPBool enabled);
>>> void NPN_PopPopupsEnabledState(NPP instance);
>>>
>>> Perhaps we can do the same thing here:
>>>
>>> void NPN_PushPluginHangDetectorState(NPP instance, NPBool enabled);
>>> void NPN_Pop PluginHangDetectorState(NPP instance);
>>>
>>
>> Sounds fine to me.
>>
>
> Me too.
>

If this sounds good to you, the next step would be getting a broader
discussion with other browser vendors on the plugin-futures mailing list (
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/plugin-futures).


>
> As for a "ping" solution, my response is the same as John's: I could make
> that work if necessary, but it would be awkward. Having an NPN_... API seems
> like a cleaner solution.
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
    http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to