On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Mike Morearty <m...@morearty.com> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 3:54 PM, John Tamplin <j...@google.com> wrote: > >> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 6:37 PM, John Abd-El-Malek <j...@chromium.org>wrote: >> >>> For reference, something similar is done for popups: >>> void NPN_PushPopupsEnabledState(NPP instance, NPBool enabled); >>> void NPN_PopPopupsEnabledState(NPP instance); >>> >>> Perhaps we can do the same thing here: >>> >>> void NPN_PushPluginHangDetectorState(NPP instance, NPBool enabled); >>> void NPN_Pop PluginHangDetectorState(NPP instance); >>> >> >> Sounds fine to me. >> > > Me too. > If this sounds good to you, the next step would be getting a broader discussion with other browser vendors on the plugin-futures mailing list ( https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/plugin-futures). > > As for a "ping" solution, my response is the same as John's: I could make > that work if necessary, but it would be awkward. Having an NPN_... API seems > like a cleaner solution. > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
