Thats fine, the fact is we are making a w2k version of chrome. What is
annoying is that there is seemigly a missinformation campaign being
mounted that suggests that a win2k version is not possible.

Anyway on to development Ramesh Srinivasan. of The Winhelponline
Blog , has published a usefull VB script that emptys  Chrome's cache.
This also works in the 2k version without modification although it may
be worth editing a few lines of the script. As for Ubantu yes it a
fine OS but there is a wealth of software that it cannot run. For many
of us who invested large amounts of money on VSTI the option of
scrapping our OS is simply not there.

" if changes are well-isolated I don't
> see why Google would not accept such patches."

Isn't that the real issue why is google being so obstructive to the
win2k user base. Seems to me there is likely only one reason and that
is down to useing MS dll's
when you sign a deal with the devil........

On Sep 19, 8:49 pm, "Seo Sanghyeon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/9/20 Alwin Garside <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > So just shut up and either stop using Windows 2000, and install some
> > decent operating system (like Ubuntu) ;-) or just don't use Google
> > Chrome.
>
> Or contribute Windows 2000 support to Google Chrome. It may not be
> accepted by Google, but it may well be; if changes are well-isolated I don't
> see why Google would not accept such patches.
>
> --
> Seo Sanghyeon
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Chromium-dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to