On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 1:31 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you this benchmark you need to be careful to do a fairly complete > impl of both, we want to make sure we account the overhead that > involves variable size (up to 256M on windows) packets, the duplex > nature and what happens when one of the sides just dies or just > decides to close the connection.
Thanks for the great comments! My basic plan for gathering some data is to start with a "raw" full duplex test jig that can vary the message size and measure delivery time accurately, then work our way up and out from there. In the longer term, it would be good to integrate performance measurements into the IPC unit tests, so that we can catch regressions and verify improvements regardless of the platform or underlying mechanism. --Amanda --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Chromium-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
