Hi Dan, Looking at the current IPC behavior is definitely on my list of things to do.
I don't think that should change the interpretation of the data though. According to our measurements, Mach messages are always faster *. So the question becomes, not is it faster, but by how many orders of magnitude. Best regards, Jeremy * Using inline messages there's a break even at some point as the cost of copying data takes over, but as discussed we can use OOL messages to get really fast (~30uSec) constant time sends for messages >5K. On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Dan Kegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 4:46 PM, Jeremy Moskovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > We ran some benchmarks of Mach ports vs FIFOs on OSX, you can find the > > results in the "Performance Considerations" section of the Design doc. > > I don't see any measurements showing what typical Chrome > IPC traffic looks like. Without that, it's hard to interpret > your results. If I missed it, please point me to it. > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Chromium-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
