On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 8:04 PM, Marshall Greenblatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> Hi Darin, > > On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 7:14 PM, Darin Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> There is no existing COM-style Chrome component that can be easily >> embedded for web rendering. >> -Darin >> > > Do you (or Google, or Chromium) have a preference when it comes to COM > frameworks? It would be nice to have an ActiveX control eventually accepted > as part of the Chromium code base. Would something implemented using pure > COM C++ and MIDL have a better chance of acceptance than something > implemented using ATL, for instance? > > Regards, > Marshall > > I'm familiar with straight COM C++ and MIDL and can imagine how that might look, but I don't know enough about the issues with ATL. I've heard some objections to ATL in the past. At any rate, it'd be good to see a more detailed proposal before committing to anything. In general, I think it could be reasonable for the chromium repository to be home to other projects derived from the chromium source. -Darin --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Chromium-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
