On Mac we definitely want an objective-C wrapper around our framework. That's what WebKit provides, and what all our consumers would expect/demand.
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 7:05 AM, Avi Drissman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've experienced CFPlugins, and I've never figured out why they use a > COM-like system there. It adds a ton of complexity for no real benefit. > > I can't speak for other platforms, but using COM on the Mac is not needed > when you have ObjC and its introspection capabilities. I don't see why a > framework wouldn't do. > > Avi > > On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 11:40 PM, Marshall Greenblatt > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> As many of you probably know there's been talk of developing a >> chrome-based ActiveX (COM) control for Windows. But what about other >> platforms? >> >> For OSX, Apple offers a COM-like framework called "Core Foundation >> Plug-ins": >> >> http://developer.apple.com/documentation/CoreFoundation/Conceptual/CFPlugIns/CFPlugIns.html >> >> For linux, there's quite a collection of COM/CORBA-like implementations: >> http://linas.org/linux/corba.html >> >> Or, getting away from COM, we have frameworks such as Qt, gtk+, wxWidgets, >> etc. What framework would you find the most useful for embedding a browser >> control in your development project(s) on the linux and/or osx platforms? >> >> - Marshall >> >> >> >> > > > > > -- Mike Pinkerton Mac Weenie [EMAIL PROTECTED] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Chromium-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
