I'm working on Linux layout tests. We're at about ~85% passing right now, but I know we still have a lot of problems.
I've recently been running into places where I'm trying to fix problems, but the Windows layout test is marked as failing, and the expected image is either wrong or old. It would be really great if we had more of the Windows layout tests fixed after the merge of doom. I know it was hard, and fixing layout tests are boring, but now the Linux team has no idea what we should be shooting for, and we have nothing to match. For example, simple tests related to text areas (we are trying to match metrics) fail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:layout_tests$ grep textarea test_lists/win/tests_fixable.txt LayoutTests/fast/forms/textarea-scrollbar-height.html = FAIL chrome/fast/forms/basic-textareas-quirks.html = FAIL LayoutTests/fast/forms/textarea-rows-cols.html = FAIL LayoutTests/fast/parser/comment-in-textarea.html = FAIL LayoutTests/fast/parser/open-comment-in-textarea.html = FAIL LayoutTests/fast/replaced/width100percent-textarea.html = FAIL chrome/fast/forms/basic-textareas.html = FAIL I have no idea how to continue with the Linux theming work, since we have no known good to match. I realize that fixing layout tests is not very attractive work, but there is some responsibility to have a trunk that is passing these layout tests. What should be the plan? Our direction was to work on layout tests exclusively. Now I am thinking we should work on other areas until Windows can get it's test coverage back to where it was per-merge, and then we actually have a baseline to try to match. -- dean --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Chromium-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
