Yep, that's simple and neat

On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Erik Kay <[email protected]> wrote:
> jam++
> Great stuff!  I like how this is integrated.  It feels very natural.
> Erik
>
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 8:16 PM, John Abd-El-Malek <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Just a heads-up that I've integrated the script into our Rietveld
>> instance.  If you use gcl, it will ping the server at a special url
>> after a patchset upload so that it can lint the files in the
>> background.  When you visit the issue page, you'll see  a "x errors"
>> link under the Lint column which takes you to the lint output. If the
>> file hasn't been linted yet, you'll see "? errors", in which case
>> clicking the link will show the errors and save it for future
>> refreshes of the issue page.
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 5:34 AM, Marc-Antoine Ruel <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > I did an internal search and the current state is:
>> >
>> > - "Folks have been looking at open sourcing cpplint"
>> > - In its current incarnation, there is a lot of google-specific checks
>> > that needs to be factored out simply because they don't apply to
>> > external and open source projects.
>> > - Nobody actually took over to do the work.
>> >
>> > So I wouldn't expect anything in the near term.
>> >
>> > M-A
>> >
>> > On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 10:24 PM, Marshall Greenblatt
>> > <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> Ok, so, back to the original question.  When can those of us external
>> >> to
>> >> google expect a code style tool? :-)
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Dean McNamee <[email protected]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> It doesn't need to be a parser, it's just a linter.  You don't really
>> >>> need to understand anything about the program to give useful warnings
>> >>> about style.  Our biggest style violation is probably trailing
>> >>> whitespace, for example.
>> >>>
>> >>> On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 7:33 PM, Benjamin <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>> >
>> >>> > You wrote a c++ parser in python? cooool!  I can't wait to see the
>> >>> > source.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > -Benjamin Meyer
>> >>> >
>> >>> > On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Pam Greene <[email protected]>
>> >>> > wrote:
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 8:30 PM, Benjamin <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Marshall Greenblatt
>> >>> >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>> >>>> Sorry to be a pest, but has there been any progress on this?
>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>>> Thanks,
>> >>> >>>> Marshall
>> >>> >>>>
>> >>> >>>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Pam Greene <[email protected]>
>> >>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>> >>>>>
>> >>> >>>>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Marshall Greenblatt
>> >>> >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>> >>>>> > Hi Mark/Pam,
>> >>> >>>>> >
>> >>> >>>>> > On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 2:48 PM, Mark Mentovai
>> >>> >>>>> > <[email protected]>
>> >>> >>>>> > wrote:
>> >>> >>>>> >>
>> >>> >>>>> >> Great question.  We've been talking about open-sourcing
>> >>> >>>>> >> something
>> >>> >>>>> >> for
>> >>> >>>>> >> this, but so far, we don't have anything yet.  We do have
>> >>> >>>>> >> something we
>> >>> >>>>> >> use internally, but someone needs to go through it and clean
>> >>> >>>>> >> up a
>> >>> >>>>> >> few
>> >>> >>>>> >> things before releasing it so that it runs well in the wild.
>> >>> >>>>> >>  When it
>> >>> >>>>> >> does materialize, it'll show up on the style guide project
>> >>> >>>>> >> (http://google-styleguide.googlecode.com/).
>> >>> >>>>> >
>> >>> >>>>> > Do you guys have a timeline in mind of when such a tool might
>> >>> >>>>> > become
>> >>> >>>>> > available?  If there are potential code licensing/IP issues,
>> >>> >>>>> > perhaps it
>> >>> >>>>> > could be made available as a web-based service?  For instance,
>> >>> >>>>> > something
>> >>> >>>>> > like the w3c validator but returning the corrections in either
>> >>> >>>>> > human-readable format or a format conducive to automation.
>> >>> >>>>>
>> >>> >>>>> Everybody's generally in support of open-sourcing the tool, and
>> >>> >>>>> I
>> >>> >>>>> don't anticipate any licensing conflicts; it's just a matter of
>> >>> >>>>> finding the time to go through it.  For what it's worth, setting
>> >>> >>>>> it
>> >>> >>>>> up
>> >>> >>>>> as a web-based service wouldn't be any faster.  More than days,
>> >>> >>>>> less
>> >>> >>>>> than months, would be my guess.
>> >>> >>>>>
>> >>> >>>>> - Pam
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> A web tool would only delay releasing a real tool.  Just curious
>> >>> >>> how
>> >>> >>> is it written?  Using llvm, rpp, or another parser?
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> It's in Python.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> - Pam
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> -Benjamin Meyer
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>> >
>> >>> >>>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >
>> >>> > >
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Chromium-dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to