On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:47, Mark Larson (Google) <[email protected]>wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:08, Jon <[email protected]> wrote: > >> *Report for 2009-1-14* >> >> With a single check-in from Finnur we got a huge boost toward our goal of >> resolving all the layout test failures! If you would like to try your hand >> at fixing a layout test you can preview the 10 minute video we are preparing >> at http://www/~jonc/layout1-2.m4v (assuming you don't all click at the >> same time and can play MPEG4). >> >> > Send internal links to internal mailing lists. It's frustrating to be told > to check something out and then realize you're forbidden from accessing it. > > Oops. Didn't mean to spam chromium-dev with that. Just to clarify: Jon's going to publish the video on YouTube and post a copy at dev.chromium.org when it's ready. The link he sent out is just a preview of the work in progress. I didn't mean we shouldn't publish the video, just that we shouldn't send out the internal-only link to the work in progress to the whole world. I'll shut up now. Mark > >> >> This really is great progress and the sooner we get past these issues the >> better! >> >> >> I still need an owner for this bug: >> >> Issue 5541 <http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=5541>: >> REGRESSION: >> bad drop-shadow rendering >> >> >> *Layout Tests* >> >> We had a net gain of 34 passing unit tests yesterday! We are closing in >> on 95% of Want to Pass! >> [image: All+Tests=76.9][image: Want+To+Pass=94.5] >> >> <http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=pMwul3Seofg4uTdanKb9iWw> >> >> [image: History of passing tests >> %]<http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=pMwul3Seofg4uTdanKb9iWw> >> Be sure to sign up at >> http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=pMwul3Seofg448Q1VFJjsJA&hl=en if >> you are going to work on a layout test. We don't want to step on each >> other's toes. >> >> All Tests is based on all available layout tests including those that we >> are currently not trying to pass. There are tests in this group which are >> known to be bad or relate to future technologies. >> >> >> Want to Pass is based on the tests that we need to be passing before we >> will ship a revision of the browser. Getting this number as high as >> possible is the goal of the stabilization effort. Some of these tests are >> failing due to subtle changes that require the test to be re-baselined. >> >> >> >> Crashers >> >> Of the 22 crashers we have assigned to "stable" we have resolved 5. As we >> get more data from the dev channel we have been adding crashers to this >> list. >> >> >> *Purify Bugs (Memory)* >> >> We have resolved 29 of the 43 Purify issues. We resolved 6 additional >> Purify bugs since the last email. >> >> >> *Regressions* >> >> We have resolved 17 of 28 regressions. We resolved two additional >> regressions. >> >> >> *Other bugs* >> >> We have also resolved 21 of the 47 "other" bugs. We resolved one more. >> >> >> So our bug burndown chart looks like this: >> >> We have popped above the blue line but we are making great progress on >> layout tests. As long as we keep the red line below the blue line we are on >> track for the bugs. Keep in mind that this does not include the work on >> Layout Tests. >> >> You will find a lot more information about the Stabilization effort on the >> Wiki at http://code.google.com/p/chromium/wiki/StabilizeTrunk >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
