> With a single check-in from Finnur we got a huge boost toward our goal of
resolving all the layout test failures!
I should point out that a big chunk of that was low-hanging fruit and that I
don't deserve all of the credit. Evan Stade and I worked together on fixing
some SVG issues and as a follow-up to that I was just going through the
manual labor of re-baselining a bunch of layout tests that either had
no/incorrect baseline and some that are now passing because of our work (and
potentially work from others).

Oh... and lastly - maybe I should also mention that there is an even bigger
chunk of layout test fixes coming soon (which also builds on some fixes from
Brett).
:)



On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 12:21, Mark Larson (Google) <[email protected]>wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:47, Mark Larson (Google) <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:08, Jon <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> *Report for 2009-1-14*
>>>
>>> With a single check-in from Finnur we got a huge boost toward our goal of
>>> resolving all the layout test failures!  If you would like to try your hand
>>> at fixing a layout test you can preview the 10 minute video we are preparing
>>> at http://www/~jonc/layout1-2.m4v (assuming you don't all click at the
>>> same time and can play MPEG4).
>>>
>>>
>> Send internal links to internal mailing lists. It's frustrating to be told
>> to check something out and then realize you're forbidden from accessing it.
>>
>>
>
> Oops. Didn't mean to spam chromium-dev with that.
>
> Just to clarify: Jon's going to publish the video on YouTube and post a
> copy at dev.chromium.org when it's ready. The link he sent out is just a
> preview of the work in progress. I didn't mean we shouldn't publish the
> video, just that we shouldn't send out the internal-only link to the work in
> progress to the whole world.
>
> I'll shut up now.
> Mark
>
>
>>
>>>
>>> This really is great progress and the sooner we get past these issues the
>>> better!
>>>
>>>
>>> I still need an owner for this bug:
>>>
>>>   Issue 5541 <http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=5541>: 
>>> REGRESSION:
>>> bad drop-shadow rendering
>>>
>>>
>>>  *Layout Tests*
>>>
>>> We had a net gain of 34 passing unit tests yesterday!  We are closing in
>>> on 95% of Want to Pass!
>>>   [image: All+Tests=76.9][image: Want+To+Pass=94.5]
>>>
>>> <http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=pMwul3Seofg4uTdanKb9iWw>
>>>
>>> [image: History of passing tests 
>>> %]<http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=pMwul3Seofg4uTdanKb9iWw>
>>>  Be sure to sign up at
>>> http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=pMwul3Seofg448Q1VFJjsJA&hl=en if
>>> you are going to work on a layout test.  We don't want to step on each
>>> other's toes.
>>>
>>> All Tests is based on all available layout tests including those that we
>>> are currently not trying to pass.  There are tests in this group which are
>>> known to be bad or relate to future technologies.
>>>
>>>
>>> Want to Pass is based on the tests that we need to be passing before we
>>> will ship a revision of the browser.  Getting this number as high as
>>> possible is the goal of the stabilization effort.  Some of these tests are
>>> failing due to subtle changes that require the test to be re-baselined.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Crashers
>>>
>>> Of the 22 crashers we have assigned to "stable" we have resolved 5.  As
>>> we get more data from the dev channel we have been adding crashers to this
>>> list.
>>>
>>>
>>> *Purify Bugs (Memory)*
>>>
>>> We have resolved 29 of the 43 Purify issues.  We resolved 6 additional
>>> Purify bugs since the last email.
>>>
>>>
>>> *Regressions*
>>>
>>> We have resolved 17 of 28 regressions. We resolved two additional
>>> regressions.
>>>
>>>
>>> *Other bugs*
>>>
>>> We have also resolved 21 of the 47 "other" bugs.  We resolved one more.
>>>
>>>
>>> So our bug burndown chart looks like this:
>>>
>>>    We have popped above the blue line but we are making great progress
>>> on layout tests.  As long as we keep the red line below the blue line we are
>>> on track for the bugs.  Keep in mind that this does not include the work on
>>> Layout Tests.
>>>
>>> You will find a lot more information about the Stabilization effort on
>>> the Wiki at http://code.google.com/p/chromium/wiki/StabilizeTrunk
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
    http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to