It's a reasonable size attack surface that we don't need. It's analogous to our decoding favicons in the renderer for security.
Adam On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Darin Fisher <[email protected]> wrote: > That sounds like a lot of overhead and a lot of costly plumbing to me. Is > it really beneficial? > -Darin > > > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 3:07 AM, Dean McNamee <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Is it not possible to process PAC in a renderer? >> >> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 5:02 AM, Darin Fisher <[email protected]> wrote: >> > We use V8 in the browser process to run the JS shell, from which it is >> > possible to type V8 debugger commands. You can telnet to this shell >> > (after >> > running chrome with a special command line switch) or open up the "JS >> > debugger" UI. >> > >> > We will also soon be using V8 in the browser process to execute PAC >> > scripts >> > in the network library. (eroman is working on that.) >> > >> > -Darin >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 5:47 AM, Dean McNamee <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> I thought the js debugger was out of process (or trying to be)? >> >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Marc-Antoine Ruel >> >> <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >> > the js debugger >> >> > >> >> > On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 5:53 AM, Dean McNamee <[email protected]> >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> What for? >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 12:18 AM, Erik Kay <[email protected]> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >>> >> >> >>> v8 is already in the browser process. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Erik >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Evan Martin <[email protected]> >> >> >>> wrote: >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> Does this mean we'll have v8 in the browser process? >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> We had idly chatted about running a 64-bit browser process to fix >> >> >>>> the >> >> >>>> library hell on Linux. It shouldn't block you either way -- I'm >> >> >>>> just >> >> >>>> curious. >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 1:42 AM, Aaron Boodman <[email protected]> >> >> >>>> wrote: >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> I'm trying to commit a change >> >> >>>>> (http://codereview.chromium.org/19737/diff/1440/1448 ) which adds >> >> >>>>> a >> >> >>>>> base class for unit tests that exercise JavaScript. It uses v8.h, >> >> >>>>> which is disallowed by DEPS. What is the right way to do this? >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> - a >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
