On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 9:45 AM, Nicolas Sylvain <[email protected]>wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Darin Fisher <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 9:38 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 9 Mar 2009, Nicolas Sylvain wrote: >>> >>> > On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 9:10 AM, Darin Fisher <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > > On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Adam Langley <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > > >>> > >> >>> > >> On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Nicolas Sylvain < >>> [email protected]> >>> > >> wrote: >>> > >> > Hello, over the weekend I made some changes to the waterfall, >>> and you >>> > >> > might be interested. >>> > >> >>> > >> Firstly, thank you! This is great. >>> > >> >>> > > >>> > > Yes, thank you Nicolas!! >>> > > >>> > >> >>> > >> > Webkit Linux (dbg) : failed to compile, seems to be a problem with >>> the >>> > >> > machine. Someone in the Linux team should look at it. >>> > >> >>> > >> This is a shared object build and, sadly, the shared build is often >>> > >> broken. Someone will get it green this week. (i.e. I'll do it if >>> > >> nobody else does). >>> > >> >>> > > >>> > > Shouldn't we move this builder to the FYI buildbot then? >>> > > >>> > >>> > We could. "Compiling chrome on linux in debug" seems important enough >>> > though. >>> > Is this shared object something that is used only on the bot? >>> >>> The Modules Linux (dbg) builder covers this case. >>> >>> I agree that this should be moved to the FYI buildbot until it's stable. >>> That's why it hasn't been in the top bar. >>> >>> >> Thanks Tony. So, if something doesn't go in the top bar, then perhaps it >> should go to the FYI waterfall? >> > > Yes, in theory it should like that. > > I thought Webkit Linux (dbg) was going to be added to the top bar really > soon. > > I think purify ui tests is just waiting for a new version of purify maybe? > After that it should be easy enough to turn it green. > > I could also move valgrind to the FYI waterfall if we don't plan to make > progress and add it to the top bar anytime soon. > > There are 2 exceptions : "XP Perf - Single Core" and "Vista Perf - Single > Core". They are important enough, but too slow to be in the top bar, and > the chances that we introduce a bug that is single core only is really > small. > i'm not sure i understand why it helps to have the top-bar differ from the main set of columns. it seems like the goal is to have everything on the main waterfall stay green all the time, and the purpose of the top-bar is to allow people to see if everything is green without having to scroll horizontally. is there some other purpose of the top-bar that i'm missing? -darin --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
