On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Aaron Boodman <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Nick Baum <[email protected]> wrote: > > Well that begs the question: if the folder gets updated, what about the > > folder it's contained in? Is it updates all the way up? I think it'd be > > simpler to not send updates for the folders when the bookmarks change. > > Why would adding a bookmark to a folder send an update event about the > folder's parent? That doesn't make sense to me. Well, if a bookmark has moved, why would that send an update about the folder? And would it also send an update to the folder it moved from? We should probably chat about the recursive stuff offline. > > I do think Nick Carter has an interesting point about modifying order > by resending the entire list. It does seem like it could be simpler. I > don't know how to fit that into this API though. It seems like you'd > need a separate function for reordering children objects. Maybe that > is OK. Yes, updating positions is ugly with the index property. This also seems tricky enough that we should discuss offline. > > > Hmm. > > - a > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
