+1. Chromium extensions have been extremely happy with the (poorly named, if I do say so myself) v8 extensions facility. I've been meaning to write a (personal) blog post about how much they rock.
- a On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Mike Belshe <[email protected]> wrote: > I've felt this way for a while, and I figured I'd throw it out to see if we > all agree. > I'm hoping we can deprecate CppBindingClass. At this point, most extensions > are better served (I think!) via the v8::extension facility than the > CppBindingObject. If there are cases where this isn't true, I'd happily > work on v8::extension to make it so it could be. > If nobody objects, I hope we can agree to stop adding any new > CppBindingClass based bindings, and then over time get rid of > CppBindingObject altogether. > Anyone feel strongly in opposition? > > Mike > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
