+1, though this means the final nail in the coffin for chrome+jsc since the layout test controller is written using CppBindingClass. -Darin
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Mike Belshe <[email protected]> wrote: > I've felt this way for a while, and I figured I'd throw it out to see if we > all agree. > I'm hoping we can deprecate CppBindingClass. At this point, most > extensions are better served (I think!) via the v8::extension facility than > the CppBindingObject. If there are cases where this isn't true, I'd happily > work on v8::extension to make it so it could be. > > If nobody objects, I hope we can agree to stop adding any new > CppBindingClass based bindings, and then over time get rid of > CppBindingObject altogether. > > Anyone feel strongly in opposition? > > Mike > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
