Sure, it could be a bit more general. - a
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Amanda Walker <[email protected]> wrote: > Hmm. Rather than an idle event, how about a general way to notify on > machine state changes? idle / busy, ac / battery, willsleep / > didwake, etc. all seem to have the same usage pattern. Apps could > then key off of the notification to start/stop workers or timers for > idle processing, etc. > > --Amanda > > 2009/5/6 Aaron Boodman <[email protected]>: >> >> This also makes sense to me as something for the wider web platform. I >> wonder if there could be awindow.onidle event. This seems generally >> useful to all web apps. >> >> - a >> >> 2009/5/6 PhistucK <[email protected]>: >>> I wish I had the disk space and the know how. >>> ☆PhistucK >>> >>> >>> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 20:08, Evan Martin <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Probably only if you do it. :) >>>> >>>> 2009/5/6 PhistucK <[email protected]>: >>>> > Mmmm... so is that going to happen soon? :) >>>> > >>>> > 2009/5/6 Evan Martin <[email protected]> >>>> >> >>>> >> base/idle_timer implements this. The only implementation detail would >>>> >> be exposing it to JS. >>> >>> >> >> >> >> > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
