I would like to give it a shot (at least the onidle event), if it is
alright.But in order to do that, I need to understand (C++, but that is
another story) where exactly you are laying the connection between the C++
events and the JavaScript events.
(I am probably talking like a newbie (who writes it that way, huh?), but
that is because I am a newbie, hehe, I never touched such code before, I
know a little Visual Basic when it comes to actual programming and not web
applications.)

I am searching for events through the codesearch, but it is not coming along
great. If you can point me to some example of firing events by C++ that
calls up the JavaScript events, it will help me a lot. I could use an
existing event as a syntax example.
(Besides that, that means window.onidle will invoke the base::IdleTimer sort
of directly with a TimeDelta::FromMilliseconds as a parameter (I am shooting
for milliseconds, like setInterval\setTimeout). I guess this is really not
secured, should I check that it is a positive number (with a limit?) first
and if so, let it rock?)


☆PhistucK


2009/5/6 Aaron Boodman <[email protected]>

> Sure, it could be a bit more general.
>
> - a
>
> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Amanda Walker <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Hmm.  Rather than an idle event, how about a general way to notify on
> > machine state changes?  idle / busy, ac / battery, willsleep /
> > didwake, etc. all seem to have the same usage pattern.  Apps could
> > then key off of the notification to start/stop workers or timers for
> > idle processing, etc.
> >
> > --Amanda
> >
> > 2009/5/6 Aaron Boodman <[email protected]>:
> >>
> >> This also makes sense to me as something for the wider web platform. I
> >> wonder if there could be awindow.onidle event. This seems generally
> >> useful to all web apps.
> >>
> >> - a
> >>
> >> 2009/5/6 PhistucK <[email protected]>:
> >>> I wish I had the disk space and the know how.
> >>> ☆PhistucK
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 20:08, Evan Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Probably only if you do it.  :)
> >>>>
> >>>> 2009/5/6 PhistucK <[email protected]>:
> >>>> > Mmmm... so is that going to happen soon? :)
> >>>> >
> >>>> > 2009/5/6 Evan Martin <[email protected]>
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> base/idle_timer implements this.  The only implementation detail
> would
> >>>> >> be exposing it to JS.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> > >>
> >>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
    http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to