Just so it's clear to me... why do we need a History menu? There's a link to history from the wrench menu/Ctrl+H and also from the New Tab page.
The back button provides at least 12 entries from the back history for the current tab. That seems more than adequate for the 'jump back a few steps in my click trail' use case. --Mark On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 20:14, Amanda Walker <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Robert Sesek <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think that Firefox's implemntation makes the most sense from a > > usability perspective. Those long menus in Safari are next to > > worthless if you have a decent-sized browsing history and really just > > clutter things up. Camino's implemntation isn't bad, either. That > > being said, I think 10 is too few items to include in the menu, and > > I'd like to see 15-20. > > > > Where do other people stand on this? > > I actively dislike long and hierarchical menus--for extended browsing, > we have a "History" link off of the new tab page for history browsing > & searching. > > However, a history menu with, say, the 10-15 most recent pages is > convenient for "go back a few steps in my click trail". More than 15 > or or so gets hard to pick from at a glance, though. > > --Amanda > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
