I built a web based application in php to upload dvd vob files to a server via the browser. The only browser that makes this project a non failure is chrome. Forget trying to upload 4+ gigs with Internet Explorer. It can not handle the memory addressing. Firefox fails 90% of the time. However chrome always gets the 4 gigs over the web interface.
Chrome, an actual browser that doesnt need compatibility buttons, and also can handle moving 4+gigs with the browser. Chrome is kick ass. On Jun 22, 12:21 am, PhistucK <[email protected]> wrote: > Really? the statistics show that many people are using the app mode?Or did > you mean web apps, as in web application websites? > > ☆PhistucK > > On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 21:03, Mike Belshe <[email protected]> wrote: > > I assume he's not a benchmark pro, but he did a decent job already. We > > can nitpick his sampling methodology - but it won't change the result. He > > is correct that many procs is far more memory consuming than single proc, > > and we already knew this. > > This is a tradeoff we made consciously and deliberately. When firefox > > crashes, all tabs go down. When firefox memory is compromised (security), > > all tabs are compromised. In chrome, we don't have those problems, but > > instead use more RAM. Further, Chrome is also able to implement per-tab > > prioritization, so that background tabs don't make foreground tabs go slow. > > Firefox can't do that. > > Lastly, lets bring the test back to reality. People don't visit 150 random > > home pages. They may have 20-30 tabs open, but many are applications, with > > cookies, javascript state and much more than just the "home page". When > > apps are in use, the memory gap between chrome and FF shrinks a lot. > > > Mike > > > On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Dan Kegel <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Mike Belshe<[email protected]> wrote: > >> > First off - kudos to the author for posting the source and steps to > >> > reproduce! Most don't do that! > > >> > Second, the author is basically right. Since he's running on Vista, its > >> a > >> > bit hard to tell whether his stats included shared memory or not; using > >> the > >> > default memory statistic ("Memory (Private Working Set)") is actually a > >> > pretty good measure to just sum. But he doesn't say which measurement > >> he > >> > used. > > >> Wait, why doesn't his program itself do the summing? > >> (I don't see it in there.) > >> Wouldn't that get rid of the ambiguity? > >> How hard would it be to add that and repost? > >> - Dan --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
