On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Dan Kegel<[email protected]> wrote: > Because of all that, you'll probably have better luck maintaining an > out of tree patchset.
This would also solve the (likely) problem of a Win2K build that fails one or more of the automated tests. We don't accept patches that cause test regressions, even if those regressions might be an acceptable tradeoff to an individual Win2K user. There are already a number of variations on Chromium that are maintained separately from the main Chromium tree by their respective authors--this might be a good way to approach maintaining a Win2K version. --Amanda --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
