On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 4:15 AM, Mark Larson (Google)<[email protected]> wrote: >> Should have been no problem, but... because the new directory >> contained a gyp file, a file was generated in that directory, >> and svn couldn't delete the directory when the revert landed. >> This caused a build breakage, and I gather from nsylvain's >> comments that this wasn't the first time this has happened. >> >> At some point soon, it'd be good to teach gyp not to generate >> files in the source tree. > > Or maybe teach gclient how to deal forcefully with directories with no files > under version control.
That's kind of, um, forceful. svn doesn't do that for a reason... > Generating files in the source tree is kinda the point of gyp. No. Generating files is the point of gyp. Nothing says they have to be in the source tree. - Dan --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
