I agree on the convenience of syncing with the users' existing (if it exists) Google Bookmarks data store. I myself have been using Google Bookmarks for quite some time and built up a nice inventory that I would love to sync directly to. Will this be a feature?
On Jul 31, 5:59 pm, Caleb Eggensperger <[email protected]> wrote: > The doc says: > > - Provide a web interface to access stored / synced bookmarks, likely via > the docs.google.com doclist. > > What about google.com/bookmarks? Shouldn't be difficult -- toolbar syncs to > there currently. > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 14:07, Tim Steele <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi! > > > A bunch of us have been working on a feature to sync user data in Chromium > > with a Google account. (Surprise! :)) The great news is that we'll be > > starting to work directly in the Chromium project this week, and let me tell > > you, are we excited to do that! This email discusses how we're planning to > > get started, in detail (maybe too much detail... sorry). > > > We have built a library that implements the client side of our sync > > protocol<http://sites.google.com/a/chromium.org/dev/developers/design-document...>, > > as well as the Google server-side infrastructure to serve Google Chrome > > users and synchronize data to their Google Account. Of course, all the code > > going into Chromium is open source, and the messages between the client and > > server use the open protobuf <http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/> format > > and library. Check out the sync developer > > page<http://sites.google.com/a/chromium.org/dev/developers/design-document...> > > if > > you're interested in low-level goals and technical details. > > > We will be landing this code in a few steps rather than one giant > > changelist for a number of reasons. First, this makes reviewing a *lot* > > easier; > > it isn't the most straightforward code by nature, so the more fine grained > > scrutiny the code gets, the better. Second, we've been working in a > > proprietary environment until now because of the dependency of having to > > build the complementary Google production server environment for syncing. > > As such, the code uses a small number of internal libraries that we need to > > open-source or replace, as well as libraries that would be redundant to what > > Chromium already includes. Removing these, and open sourcing the entire > > sync engine, is our highest priority and we expect this to take about three > > weeks. > > > So how will we commit the code in pieces and not totally hose the build in > > the process? First, a little more background. You may have come across the > > CHROME_PERSONALIZATION #define when digging through Chromium source code. > > Right now, this is used in conjunction with a relatively small number of > > private c++ source files to conditionally build Chromium with sync enabled. > > These files are in fact a glue layer between Chromium and what is called > > the "syncapi", which is the bulk of the client library I was talking about > > above. On windows, syncapi is built into a DLL, and when > > CHROME_PERSONALIZATION is defined this DLL gets placed alongside chrome.dll > > for use at runtime. Syncapi builds and runs on Linux, but not Mac (yet). > > > With the initial checkin, we will leave the CHROME_PERSONALIZATION #define > > as-is, so the sync code will not be built by default. We'll be working hard > > over the coming weeks to make sure the code passes all existing test suites > > that are part of the regular buildbot cycle, and on removing the #define. > > After that, our hope is that we will be free of the DLL altogether and have > > all the code checked in to the repository, fully functional or not, in a few > > weeks. We do *not* plan on ever checking in the windows-only syncapi dll > > to the main chromium repository. So until the dll is no longer needed, the > > public repository won't have all the bits to actually build Chromium with > > sync enabled. That said, we want to keep the sync build running smoothly, > > so we will use a combination of command-line flag (to enable sync) and > > delay-loading syncapi.dll only when it is needed. This will allow the > > "glue" code to compile as part of the normal Chromium build without > > introducing a dependency on this dll, yet still make it possible to run with > > the dll present. > > > On that note, we're planning to use the syncapi DLL to produce a > > sync-enabled Google Chrome build for dev-channel users in a week or so, to > > get the feature into experimentally inclined hands. We have a great deal of > > infrastructure, both in the browser and in the form of production Google > > services, that need to start seeing real user traffic and usage. It takes a > > great deal of testing and confidence inspired by real usage statistics > > before any complex system like this can be deemed adequate for use by a > > large user base. So if we want to let all Google Chrome users use sync (and > > we do! we do!), we've got to get started on this pronto. > > > Our developer > > page<http://sites.google.com/a/chromium.org/dev/developers/design-document...> > > also > > covers the hierarchy of files we're landing that you can expect to start > > syncing (in the gclient sense) down in the next couple of days. We can't > > wait (*really*) to work on this with the rest of the Chromium community > > and going even further in creating the best browzr ever! > > > Thanks for reading, and happy syncing! > > > - the cloudy bunch > > {idana, nick, nickbaum, chee, munjal, brg, chron, zork, laforge, tejasshah, > > tim} at chromium.org > > -- > Caleb Eggenspergerhttp://calebegg.com/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
