Yes. Major feature work should have a design doc sent to chromium-dev.
Please write one up in the design docs section of dev.chromium.org.

-Ben

On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Jeremy Orlow<[email protected]> wrote:
> Is there any reason you're doing this on appspot's code review, not
> chromium's?
> I reviewed half the patch at a high level.  I think there's plenty of
> comments to address for now.  Once those are addressed, I'm happy to take a
> deeper dive with the rest if there aren't any more qualified reviewers who'd
> like to take it on.
> Even though this has been discussed to death, it might be good to still
> write up a mini-design doc since that's easier than code to review and I'm
> sure there's plenty of people who'd like to sanity check the design.  (That
> said, I didn't see any major design flaws while reviewing.)
> J
>
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 4:52 PM, John Gregg <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Sorry, maybe not.  It's a big world to keep up to date!  Between WHATWG,
>> webkit-dev, and offline it's been discussed at some length at many levels,
>> but not much on this list as I check the archives.
>>
>> But in any case, while the code patch is large as I said I consider it
>> preliminary, and this is why I ask for feedback on the document (and the
>> design expressed in it) as well as the code.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>   -John
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Ben Goodger (Google) <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Has a design doc for this feature in general been sent around? This is
>>> a fairly large change otherwise.
>>>
>>> -Ben
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 4:13 PM, Evan Martin<[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Evan Martin<[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 3:51 PM, John Gregg<[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >>> As I mentioned to some of you offline, I would greatly appreciate a
>>> >>> "pre-review" so I can start to work out the issues and be as ready as
>>> >>> possible to check in once the WebKit process finishes.
>>> >>
>>> >> Looks promising, but I see Mac and Windows code and no Linux.  ?
>>> >
>>> > To clarify, I'd at least like to see the design doc address how and
>>> > whether this will work on Linux.  For example, suppose the APIs
>>> > available were more broad -- maybe then there is extra information
>>> > that ought to be plumbed around.
>>> >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>
>>
>> >>
>
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
    http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to