On Sep 18, 11:56 am, PhistucK <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry! replace that with 195! > ☆PhistucK
Yeah sorry for my insistence, I guessed it was just a typo but I thought maybe there was more to it so I was asking just in case... On Sep 18, 3:12 pm, Marc-Antoine Ruel <[email protected]> wrote: > Still, I'd find that worrying that we have a 42% perf regression in trunk. > > But you're using sunspider, which is mostly **** anyway (personal > opinion). Are you using a laptop? It greatly influences the timing of > this test. > > M-A I tested that in a low-end core 2 duo desktop. And the results were very consistent, I repeated them dozens of times. I should also note that every particular test inside sunspider was always slower. So it's not an issue of one of the tests being a bottleneck. Anyway, thanks for your help, everyone. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
