On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Ojan Vafai <[email protected]> wrote: > +pam, tc, darin in case they disagree with what I'm saying here. > > Also a bunch of current expectations would need to be modified. All > the cases where there is currently FAIL would need to be changed to > either FAIL or IMAGE or both if it's a text and image failure. You > should be able to get most of the data for this by looking at the > layout test dashboard. The only exception is you won't be able to > distinguish tests that fail both image and text from tests that only > fail image. > > A short-term solution could be to leave FAIL meaning IMAGE and/or TEXT > and adding IMAGE and TEXT for image-only and text-only failures. Then > we can gradually excise the FAIL lines from text_expectations.
I think is a great plan. :DG< --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
