On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Ojan Vafai <[email protected]> wrote:
> I don't think this is just about ignoring image-only results on mac for the > short-term. My subjective sense is that we have many tests that start out as > failing only image comparisons (e.g. due to theming), but over time another > failure creeps in that causes a text failure that goes unnoticed. We'd > ideally like to notice that extra regression when it happens as it might be > easy to identify and fix right at the time the regression occurs. > That's pretty much where we are with the Mac pixel tests--we do want to know if layout geometry regresses, even if there's a known pixel expectation failure (a color, or a missing spelling underline, or whatever it is for that test). --Amanda --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
