That is one of the goals of creating and upstreaming the WebKit API.

On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Evan Martin <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Q. Does this mean you can build a libwebkit.so independently of Chrome?
>
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Yaar Schnitman <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > As some of you probably noticed, fundamental changes are underway in how
> we
> > build and integrate webkit into chromium. Here is a status update and
> some
> > answers for frequently asked questions:
> > Recent changes:
> > 1. Chromium now builds using gyp files living on the webkit.org tree
> > (WebCore.gyp & JavaScriptCore.gyp).
> > 2. The Webkit Chromium Port has its own DEPS file, which lives on
> > the webkit.org tree too (third_party/WebKit/WebKit/chromium/DEPS). This
> DEPS
> > file includes a minimal set of dependencies that our port requires in
> order
> > to be independently built outside of a full chromium checkout.
> > 3. The useful update-webkit and build-webkit scripts now allow a
> > "--chromium" argument which syncs and builds the chromium port with the
> help
> > of gclient and gyp.
> > Next steps:
> > 1. An internal webkit chromium port try bot: Will help test webkit-only
> > patches. At first stage, it will test build failures (saving many of us
> the
> > need to manually test on 3 platforms), but later will also conduct
> chromium
> > port layout tests and api unit tests.
> > 2. Upstreaming chromium's webkit api to webkit.org, which will further
> > reduce the need for 2-sides commits and blockage.
> > 3. Upstreaming chromium's test_shell and layout tests, allowing us to
> detect
> > webkit-chromium breakage before we integrate into chromium.
> > FAQs:
> > Q: Which dependencies does webkit use when built into chromium?
> > A: When built independently, webkit will link with revisions as specified
> in
> > the upstream DEPS file. When built as part of chromium, it will link with
> > the revisions specified in the downstream DEPS.
> > Q: When I change src/DEPS, do I also have to change upstream
> > third_party/WebKit/WebKit/chromium/DEPS?
> > A: It depends why you update src/DEPS. Theoretically, you should only
> update
> > the upstream DEPS if the fix to the dependency actually changes the way
> > webkit interacts with it, or fixes a bug in the webkit layout tests.
> > However, if the change is only relevant to chromium, than webkit's DEPS
> need
> > not be updated. If that change breaks webkit, we will surely find it when
> we
> > build chromium.
> > Q: Why don't we control webkit's dependencies in a single place?
> > A: Most of the dependencies that webkit uses are also used directly by
> > chromium. Therefore, we will often find ourselves rolling webkit
> revisions
> > just because chromium needs a third party revision update. We have been
> > there once, it was painful, we don't want to go there again. As explained
> > above, we don't mind upstream webkit builds using older deps.
> > Q: Wouldn't dependencies be fetched twice because they are specified in
> both
> > upstream and downstream DEPS?
> > A: No, because when synched as part of a full chromium checkout, all DEPS
> > files under third_party are ignored. We only want the port's DEPS fetched
> on
> > a standalone webkit checkout.
> >
> > Q: We already have layout try bots. Why also have a webkit chromium port
> try
> > bots?
> > A: The existing layout try bot builds webkit along with the rest of
> > chromium. We want to be able to try an independent upstream-only build
> and
> > eventually contribute our try system to webkit.org so all webkit
> developers
> > can use it. This will help protect chromium from disruptive upstream
> > changes.
> > Q: Wait, do we have .gyp and DEPS files on the webkit tree?
> > A: Yes. And we believe other webkit ports could follow our example and
> use
> > gclient and gyp too.
> > >
> >
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
    http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to