FWIW, I build with scons. I only build Linux once a month or so, and the default build instructions told me to use scons. I'd imagine lots of people who are just playing with chrome on the side use scons too.
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Albert J. Wong (王重傑) <[email protected]> wrote: > If I'm not mistaken, I think like most everyone running on linux is using > the make build nowadays, and the make build seems to work well enough for > most people. The only time I hear someone mention the scons build, it's in > reference to "you broke the scons build," or "so you developed on make. Did > you check it worked on scons?" > Given that, what's keeping us from killing the scons build completely? > My current motivation for asking is that I've been spending the last hour > trying to figure out why scons is deciding to insert an -fPIC into my build, > whereas make is not. This is on top of my previous motivation (from about 3 > days ago) where I spent another few hours making something that worked fine > on the make build, scons compatible. I'd rather spend that time killing > scons if there was a clear list of what was needed to make that happen. > -Albert > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
