On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 20:43, Peter Kasting <pkast...@google.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Evan Martin <ev...@google.com> wrote:
>
>> Since we're talking about style, I'll note that this pattern is no
>> good (and I've seen it explicitly called out somewhere before).
>>
>> The problem is that your assertions are not helpful. You get
>> "expected 'foo', got 'bar' on line 80" but line 80 is just the body of
>> a for loop.
>
>
> (a) I frequently write EXPECT_EQ(a, b) << "Test case in question is " << c;
> (b) Even when this is not true it costs me almost no time to track down the
> case in question in the debugger (if I need to; often the expected result is
> unique)
>
You can also use SCOPED_TRACE (learned that from eroman).
--
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe:
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
