No worries. I think you're on to something, though. Now, admitting that I can only go by what I read in the forums, I have a thought. I've been using Firefox for years. When I switched from a PC to a Mac, the first thing I installed was Firefox. While FF has many fine features, my main reason for continuing to use it is it's flexibility. I can customize it for exactly what I use and need. Admittedly, Chrome is in Beta, but I think that the more flexibility it offers, the more you can customize it for your needs, the more likely people are to try it. So, I think your ideas have merit and those who are working on Chrome should include and expand on them.
On Sep 5, 2:06 pm, "Daniel Hagen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I did see that, and I'm looking for a solution for you. > Someone mentioned bookmarkinghttp://www.google.com/bookmarks/or setting it > as your homepage. That's a simple, yet not very elegant, solution. > > Also, manipulating Bookmark's API is fairly easy, and producing an XML file > with the bookmarks is a URL away. So if we had an XML bookmark importer, > you'd be set. > But that doesn't solve syncing with Bookmarks. It allows download, but not > easily upload (a Javascript bookmark to automatically add the current viewed > page might work alright, but is less than ideal). > > I'm looking at different possibilities of designing a Google Bookmarks > integration. First thing that comes to mind is, of course, just using all > the bookmarks and labels in the account, downloading them and displaying > them in the bookmarks bar. A starting point, maybe, but not necessarily the > best choice. We could make a "live folder" that is synced up with the server > and only bookmarks within it are synced. This might make more sense for > organization and privatizing bookmarks (some bookmarks may be for work, some > for home, and the mixing of both may not be desired). > > Also, there's handling the Google Account. The toolbar takes care of this > with the status/login feature on the right side of the bar. I don't think we > want something like that. My gut instinct is to suggest adding a "Google > Features" tab to the options dialog for the browser. This would allow the > user to specify authentication details and check mark the services s/he > would like to integrate, bookmarks being one of them. It would also be a > good idea to have an area for specifying when and how often to sync. > Especially if this is going to be used on Android. A user might be just fine > with syncing up his bookmarks every time s/he starts up 'Droid, but that > takes bandwidth, and I think all users would be glad if we assisted in > limiting the excessive bandwidth usage. Do you do it daily? Weekly? I think > it would be fair to say that every time a user adds a bookmark, that the > whole list is updated. Also (I'm not sure of this, because I haven't looking > into Bookmark's API too much yet), it might be possible to check the HTTP > Modified header of the bookmark XML file, or some such tool to see if a full > sync is needed. Of course, I'm quibbling about minuscule data amounts. The > whole XML file is no bigger than most HTML files, but data optimization > begins at the bottom. > > Sorry for the long message. I started by trying to answer the below reply, > but this turned more into my writing out my thoughts on such an integration. > Anyone have comments on my proposal? > > -Daniel > > On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 12:15 PM, Paul B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Daniel, > > Perhaps you didn't notice that I said I'm on a Mac and there is no > > version of Chrome for Mac, yet. However, since my primary reason for > > wanting to have the toolbar is because I store all of my bookmarks on > > it, if there is a way to simply have those bookmarks imported directly > > to Chrome, that would work for me. > > > On Sep 5, 12:18 pm, Daniel H <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I just grabbed the source last night trying to find out just how easy > > > it would be to implement Google Bookmarks (and potentially other > > > services. I'm still looking around, though. (And VC++ 2008 Express is > > > baulking at the project files. Looks like I'm missing some .vprops > > > files. :-/) > > > > But since this thread is about the toolbar, and not JUST bookmarks... > > > What do we WANT from the toolbar, and how much is it really needed? > > > > I for one really like the clean appearance of Chrome right now, and > > > I'd hate to add a lot of mess to the system. Bookmarks are easy, as > > > there is already a well designed application of them included already. > > > Word highlighting and searching is fairly well taken care of with the > > > internal page search (have you tried it? I love the highlighting on > > > the V. scrollbar). The rest of the features are automatic linking, > > > spell checking, and buttons. > > > > So what say you? Anything besides bookmarks that you're dying to > > > have? :-) > > > > -Daniel > > > > On Sep 5, 11:10 am, Paul B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I would think that the toolbar would be a must. Especially for someone > > > > like me. I use Firefox (Since Chrome for Mac isn't out, yet) with the > > > > Google toolbar and I store ALL of my bookmarks in the toolbar. It > > > > would be a real pain to have to have both browsers open and have to > > > > open each of roughly 150 bookmarked sites in FF so that I could copy > > > > and paste them into Chrome, just to bookmark them. > > > > > On Sep 5, 11:03 am, tommylemong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Any plans to implement Google Toolbar into Chrome. Obviously as an > > > > > option, I for one like Google Toolbar. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Chromium-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
