-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hector wrote: > I am beginning to become very concern and these means pursuing actions > that I do not wish to escalate to.
Just out of curiosity: What kind of actions and escalations would that be that you are going to pursue against *google* in this matter? Well we hear about it in the prime time news on CNN etc. when this happens? > Trying to pass the buck to our WINSERVER (Wildcat! Interactive Net > Server) Web Server component is unacceptable. If I were you I would just patch my server so that it works with all browsers instead of trying to effect a change of the protocl definition and its implementation in all existing browsers. Did you lose your source code? - -- private communication within hostile networks: http://torchat.googlecode.com/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFI2Pl3xT6R4jlFoh0RAmJAAJ973Ls8ZdDUpNsQPIbChNinB0q6uACfWc6y RwesGyuHI4fJUNx2IBZ6ULU= =0g9M -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Chromium-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
