heh-heh-heh (sorry...) heh-heh... On 9/23/2008 10:13 AM, Bernd Kreuss wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hector wrote: > >> I am beginning to become very concern and these means pursuing actions >> that I do not wish to escalate to. >> > > Just out of curiosity: What kind of actions and escalations would that > be that you are going to pursue against *google* in this matter? Well we > hear about it in the prime time news on CNN etc. when this happens? > > >> Trying to pass the buck to our WINSERVER (Wildcat! Interactive Net >> Server) Web Server component is unacceptable. >> > > If I were you I would just patch my server so that it works with all > browsers instead of trying to effect a change of the protocl definition > and its implementation in all existing browsers. Did you lose your > source code? > > > - -- > private communication within hostile networks: > http://torchat.googlecode.com/ > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFI2Pl3xT6R4jlFoh0RAmJAAJ973Ls8ZdDUpNsQPIbChNinB0q6uACfWc6y > RwesGyuHI4fJUNx2IBZ6ULU= > =0g9M > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > >
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Chromium-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
