I'll add another vote for this and add bookmark importing as well. On 10/3/2008 5:21 AM, Lime wrote: > i agree too > > On 9 Set, 01:09, JLRS<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I completely agree w/ this suggestion. Exporting is just as important >> as importing. >> >> Alternatively: If the Chrome browser were to allow a linking to one's >> gmail acctbookmarks(http://www.google.com/bookmarks/) via the chrome >> browserbookmarks, this would be more useful and would essentially >> eliminate the need for anexportfunction as allbookmarksare already >> centralized online. >> >> Also, I realize there is a defined purpose w/ this open source project >> to keep the browser search engine neutral (i.e. offering Yahoo, Ask, >> etc as alternatives to Google search). It may be the case the it >> could keep thebookmarksneutral by offering to allow users to link >> into their yahoo onlinebookmarks, etc (but yahoo and other engines >> would have to expose that functionality). >> >> On Sep 3, 5:35 pm, B97209<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>> Iexportmybookmarksto other computers that I use in order to >>> maintain the years of experience. While, I can import to Chrome, >>> there is notexportmechanism. It acts as a dead end. >>> >>> Great job on the browser. Gmail is so much faster. >>> > > > >
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Chromium-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
