Isn't the idea of Chrome to provide a lightweight yet powerful browsing experience? So if we load it up with nice visual effects not only are we consuming more resources to provide the visual effects but it also means less time spent on the core functionality of the browser. I think the Devs need to spend more time on the core of the engine rather then the visually appealing effects.
On Feb 19, 9:59 am, PhistucK <[email protected]> wrote: > Right, but when it is visible, it can be a more stylish throbber. > ☆PhistucK > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 17:48, Meok <[email protected]> wrote: > > Chrome doesn't treat the throbber in the conventional manner, in that > > there is no inactive state. In other words, it's not always visible > > and only appears while a tab is loading. They would have to pin a > > throbber on the far right of the toolbar like Netscape. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Discussion mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-discuss -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
