what if you place a site on more than one profiles? e.g. google.com what should be choosen?
On 24 Feb, 20:46, de_mattos <[email protected]> wrote: > > Actually, Chrome scans the 'Visited links' database to mark the visited > > links as visited, so it scans databases anyway for every link. The list (of > > links and of visited links) can be enormous, yet it scans it.So that it not > > a real issue, in my opinion. > > You're right: no issue at all! > > > The thing is, this feature is not really that necessary. It is a "nice to > > have" extension style feature, but really not a must have core feature. > > I think you're more or less right about this too: it isn't a necessary > future. > But on the other hand: the current implementation of profiles doesn't > satisfy me at all. To open a profile window we need to click through > menus or otherwise we have to remind a shortcut for every profile. > When we wan't to open a link in another profile, we even have to copy- > paste it! I think that all current Chrome futures which aren't > satisfying need full attention for improvement. > > The idea of profile listing in context menu would be a first step! I > opened a issue for it:http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=8013. > > On 23 feb, 08:26, PhistucK <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Actually, Chrome scans the 'Visited links' database to mark the visited > > links as visited, so it scans databases anyway for every link. The list (of > > links and of visited links) can be enormous, yet it scans it.So that it not > > a real issue, in my opinion. > > The thing is, this feature is not really that necessary. It is a "nice to > > have" extension style feature, but really not a must have core feature. > > > ☆PhistucK > > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 19:52, andriyin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi All! > > > I support this proposal. And I have an additional reasons for it too. > > > I'm think it's were reasonable if the Crome browser can be do it in > > > this list: > > > 1. Can be switching 'on fly' to an creates user's profile (without > > > restart the Chrome!), who contain this parameters and features: > > > (a) all opened tabs; > > > (b) users cookies and login/password list for this users item (for > > > logging to a users private pages correctly); > > > (c) user's profiled bookmarks collection. > > > 2. On uses the Chrome by swithed user's profile the 'star' button (who > > > do add operation for this page to bookmark set) MUST add it to > > > contained bookmark collection (i.e. connected to THIS user profile). > > > 3. On future: the Chrome can be connect to online bookmarker (like > > > Google Bookmark or Foxmarks) by uses the profile user set: bookmark > > > collection, login and password for logging it. (The proposal of uses > > > online bookmarks - it's other reason and other talk theme...) > > > NB. IMHO, the proposal by de_mattos (says about the context right > > > click menu) - it's cannot reasonable idea, because it does lost the > > > browser' performance. And it's truth to David says: "Would be too > > > much work because Chrome would have to search eachprofile to see which > > > profile contained the url" - it's true reason if users bookmark > > > collection has many records (numbered about one or many thousands - > > > this is true, because uses it for many advanced users)... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Discussion mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-discuss -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
