I have the same configuration (XP SP3, Chrome 2.0.172.31) and I can't
reproduce it. When I refresh a page, I can at most reach 100% usage of
a single core, for a very short time, but it isn't the typical
behaviour. I have a Q6600, that is a quad core: by refreshing a heavy
site I can see CPU usage up to 29%, but with smaller sites  (such as
this one) it doesn't go beyond 5%.

On Jun 20, 7:42 pm, Hunnter2k3 <[email protected]> wrote:
> I thought i would be a little more helpful by replying with details,
> since i was a little frustrated earlier.
> WIN XP SP3
> Chrome 2.0.172.31
>
> When a page is refreshed, the parent process spawns loads (10+) of
> ntdll.dll threads, all using a lot of CPU.  (RtlAllocateHeap+0x18c )
>
> Might be a bug, or a feature, hopefully the former.
> Same happens in SRWare Iron too.  (but that was expected)
>
> On Jun 20, 2:45 pm, Hunnter2k3 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Ever since V2 has been pushed, the CPU usage for Chrome has sky-
> > rocketed every time i am loading pages.
> > Every time a page is loading, both cores are hitting 100%.
> > Worse is when sites are lagging or slow, the CPU is still at 100%
> > until it is finished, no ifs or buts.
>
> > I even done a fresh install, I even installed SRWare's Iron, it still
> > hits 100% when a page loads.
>
> > If this is what V2 is going to be like, i am going straight back to
> > V1, i don't want a browser eating 100% and interrupting other
> > processes, especially if it is because of a feature i couldn't care
> > less about.
>
> > Is this what has happened to Full Page Zoom now, instead of generating
> > it each time a person wants to zoom?
> > If so, for the love of everything decent, please go back to the old
> > system, i don't care for FPZ and never will,  or at least start using
> > that wonderful thing called Options and add it in there, please.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Chromium Discussion mailing list: [email protected] 
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: 
    http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-discuss
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to