>>>> I think you should not inject HTML into the infobar >>>> Anything greater than that, should be a toolstrip\mole\sidebar (once it is >>>> implemented).
Is there a sidebar spec? It seems possible to me that an infobar would just be a specialized sidebar. I think there is a need for extensions to be able to display arbitrary HTML in a rectangular window that is anchored to one of the sides of the content window (including top or bottom). And perhaps the implementer should think of this as the the InfoBar being just one scenario that could be met by a more generic implementation? - Don On Sep 16, 11:05 pm, PhistucK <phist...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think you should not inject HTML into the infobar, because it makes it > complicated, takes longer to implement (I think the regular infobars do not > support it) and is kind of getting out of scope for the whole infobar > notion. It should have an icon (that you may specify, but maybe extension > infobars should have the same 'extension infobar icon'), some text\link and > a maximum of two buttons, in my opinion. > Anything greater than that, should be a toolstrip\mole\sidebar (once it is > implemented). > > ☆PhistucK > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 02:44, Matias Pelenur <matiaspele...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > > > Another proposal, this one to allow showing infobars (the messages > > that appear at the top of the page): > > > http://docs.google.com/View?id=df7t9p5p_18czx3jmgp > > > Thanks, > > matias --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Chromium-extensions" group. To post to this group, send email to chromium-extensions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to chromium-extensions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-extensions?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
