That's great, thank you! On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 7:12 AM Miroslav Lichvar <mlich...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 09:31:10AM +0100, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 02:37:20PM -0700, Joe Williams wrote: > > > In this test set up chronyc sources shows the PHC PPS-only refclock as > a > > > falseticker and synchronizes fine with the FB time server. Which is > why I > > > was wondering if it needed to be disciplined in some way to make it > useful. > > > > It needs to be synchronized. chronyd cannot use a time source for > > frequency only. > > The latest code in git has a new "local" option to use stable > free-running refclocks (e.g. TCXO, OCXO, atomic clock) for > stabilization of the system clock, e.g. > > refclock PHC /dev/ptp0 local poll 0 > > To take advantage of the improved stability, other sources specified > in the config file should use a longer polling interval and/or the > filter option, and possibly also set minsamples to 64. > > -- > Miroslav Lichvar > > > -- > To unsubscribe email chrony-users-requ...@chrony.tuxfamily.org > with "unsubscribe" in the subject. > For help email chrony-users-requ...@chrony.tuxfamily.org > with "help" in the subject. > Trouble? Email listmas...@chrony.tuxfamily.org. > >
