On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 12:52:06PM +0000, MUZZULINI Frank wrote: > Hi, > > This one really puzzles me: > MS Name/IP address Stratum Poll Reach LastRx Last sample > =============================================================================== > =x 192.168.42.1 11 5 367 38 +63.5s[ +63.5s] +/- > 121us > =x 192.168.42.2 11 6 377 78 +58.2s[ +58.2s] +/- > 42us > =x 192.168.42.3 11 7 0 799 +79.2s[ +79.2s] +/- > 110us > =x 192.168.42.4 11 8 0 84m +112.2s[+112.2s] +/- > 112us > ^x 172.16.253.1 2 10 377 1010 +835ms[ +835ms] +/- > 8853us > ^x 10.26.59.11 1 9 377 212 +836ms[ +836ms] +/- > 859us > ^x 10.26.59.12 1 8 377 194 +836ms[ +836ms] +/- > 909us > ^x 10.26.59.13 1 8 377 22 +836ms[ +836ms] +/- > 838us > > There are four server that agree on the correct time. > There are also two peers which are free running just like the machine itself. > Why is it not selecting one of the servers?
If those two unreachable sources don't become reachable, it should eventually reach a majority and update the clock. Otherwise you would need at least 5 working sources. > Using stratum 11 to synchronise peers amongst each other when the uplink is > down is normal practice, isn't it? (It didn't seem to work here neither, but > this may have a good reason, these are test-VMs and they may have done wild > things...) Only one source should be using the local reference unless the orphan mode is enabled. If upstream connectivity is normally expected to work, it's best to avoid local completely. -- Miroslav Lichvar -- To unsubscribe email chrony-users-requ...@chrony.tuxfamily.org with "unsubscribe" in the subject. For help email chrony-users-requ...@chrony.tuxfamily.org with "help" in the subject. Trouble? Email listmas...@chrony.tuxfamily.org.
