Sorry,

chuck --silent

doesn't work for this use case?

On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Ryan Supak <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yeah, that's what I ended up doing in my case. But it was with a Raspberry
> Pi and I was trying to conserve every cycle possible. rs
>
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Forrest Curo <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Umm, if I left audio 'on' but simply didn't generate any of it through
>> Chuck?
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 7:33 AM, Ryan Supak <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> There you have it. :) Would love a flag or option that doesn't force me
>>> to have a sound card to get accurate timing though.
>>>
>>> rs
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thursday, October 30, 2014, Robert Poor <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> > Recently, i found that I have to turn audio on, otherwise the timing
>>>> runs way too fast.
>>>>
>>>> That's a feature, not a bug! :)  What's going on is that ChucK uses
>>>> the DAC's clock for timing.  When you run without audio, ChucK simply
>>>> runs as fast as possible, which is great, for example, when you're
>>>> writing complex audio to a sound file.
>>>>
>>>> - Rob
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 7:28 AM, Ryan Supak <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > Recently, i found that I have to turn audio on, otherwise the timing
>>>> runs
>>>> > way too fast. (Only an issue, I guess, if you're needing it to be
>>>> accurate
>>>> > and not just fast.)
>>>> >
>>>> > rs
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On Thursday, October 30, 2014, Forrest Curo <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> As I understand it, you send some number to 'now'
>>>> >> and for that length of time the confuser will continue to run
>>>> whatever
>>>> >> oscillator instances you've started, then go on through your code.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> So if you only used it to generate values to trigger voices and
>>>> changes in
>>>> >> other software, you could run Chuck without much overhead?
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Is this right, and how can I minimize that overhead?
>>>> >>
>>>> >> [Forrest Curo
>>>> >> San Diego]
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > chuck-users mailing list
>>>> > [email protected]
>>>> > https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
>>>> >
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> chuck-users mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> chuck-users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> chuck-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> chuck-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
>
>
_______________________________________________
chuck-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users

Reply via email to