I count two +1 votes. Was there a third +1 that was sent only to priv...@hadoop, and not to chukwa-dev or to me? Anything more we need to do, on the chukwa development side?
--Ari On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 md5 is right, afaict the RAT output looks fine (based on my experience > with ZK, IANAL) and "ant test" passes (ubuntu jaunty). > > Patrick > > Ariel Rabkin wrote: >> >> Hello again, PMC! >> >> At Patrick Hunt's advice, I've gone and audited our code for licensing >> issues, and rolled a new release candidate. >> >> Main changes from previous release candidate: >> - Fixed small bug in one test case, where relative path needed to be >> converted to absolute. >> - License headers everywhere, notice file updated to mention all >> non-ASF inclusions. >> - Corrected some typos in documentation, substantially lengthened README >> file. >> >> RAT has some false positives, mostly code under BSD/MIT-style licenses >> that we've incorporated. Appropriate notice has been given, in each >> case. >> >> Latest release candidate is >> http://people.apache.org/~asrabkin/chukwa-0.3.0-candidate-4/ MD5 hash >> of the .tar.gz should be 44222167087177d4ad42c7460ba98ba7 >> >> Comfortable releasing this? >> >> --Ari >> > -- Ari Rabkin [email protected] UC Berkeley Computer Science Department
