No, this received only two +1 votes. Would someone else please take a look at this? -C
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Ariel Rabkin <[email protected]> wrote: > I count two +1 votes. Was there a third +1 that was sent only to > priv...@hadoop, and not to chukwa-dev or to me? Anything more we need > to do, on the chukwa development side? > > --Ari > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: >> +1 md5 is right, afaict the RAT output looks fine (based on my experience >> with ZK, IANAL) and "ant test" passes (ubuntu jaunty). >> >> Patrick >> >> Ariel Rabkin wrote: >>> >>> Hello again, PMC! >>> >>> At Patrick Hunt's advice, I've gone and audited our code for licensing >>> issues, and rolled a new release candidate. >>> >>> Main changes from previous release candidate: >>> - Fixed small bug in one test case, where relative path needed to be >>> converted to absolute. >>> - License headers everywhere, notice file updated to mention all >>> non-ASF inclusions. >>> - Corrected some typos in documentation, substantially lengthened README >>> file. >>> >>> RAT has some false positives, mostly code under BSD/MIT-style licenses >>> that we've incorporated. Appropriate notice has been given, in each >>> case. >>> >>> Latest release candidate is >>> http://people.apache.org/~asrabkin/chukwa-0.3.0-candidate-4/ MD5 hash >>> of the .tar.gz should be 44222167087177d4ad42c7460ba98ba7 >>> >>> Comfortable releasing this? >>> >>> --Ari >>> >> > > > > -- > Ari Rabkin [email protected] > UC Berkeley Computer Science Department >
