+1 Looks good /Jerome On 1/6/12 8:15 AM, "Ahmed Fathalla" <[email protected]> wrote:
>+1 > >On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Bill Graham <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Chris Douglas <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > Signature matches; would you mind uploading an MD5, also? >> > >> > The LICENSE and NOTICE changes look good to me. If that's the only >> > change from RC0, I think it's reasonable to start a [VOTE] thread >> > including both general@incubator and chukwa-dev@, and run them >> > concurrently. >> > >> > The CDDL license in lib (jersey-bundle-LICENSE) is included in the >> > top-level LICENSE labeled as jsr311-api? >> > >> > All the unit tests passed, also. Ran RAT as part of the verify target, >> > so that looks great. >> > >> > +1 -C >> > >> > On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Eric Yang <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > Hi all, >> > > >> > > IPMC had additional input about Chukwa license.txt and notice.txt. >> > > The license files are updated, and restarting the voting process for >> > > release candidate 1. With Chris's recommendation that we should >> > > only submit source tarball for voting to reduce the work on license >> > > issues on binary dependencies. >> > > >> > > The source tarball is available at: >> > > >> > > http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc1/ >> > > >> > > Documents are available at: >> > > >> > > http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-docs/ >> > > >> > > Please download, evaluate, and vote on this list. >> > > Thanks >> > > >> > > regards, >> > > Eric >> > >> > > > >-- >Ahmed Fathalla
