+1
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Jerome Boulon <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > Looks good > /Jerome > > On 1/6/12 8:15 AM, "Ahmed Fathalla" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>+1 >> >>On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Bill Graham <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Chris Douglas <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > Signature matches; would you mind uploading an MD5, also? >>> > >>> > The LICENSE and NOTICE changes look good to me. If that's the only >>> > change from RC0, I think it's reasonable to start a [VOTE] thread >>> > including both general@incubator and chukwa-dev@, and run them >>> > concurrently. >>> > >>> > The CDDL license in lib (jersey-bundle-LICENSE) is included in the >>> > top-level LICENSE labeled as jsr311-api? >>> > >>> > All the unit tests passed, also. Ran RAT as part of the verify target, >>> > so that looks great. >>> > >>> > +1 -C >>> > >>> > On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Eric Yang <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > > Hi all, >>> > > >>> > > IPMC had additional input about Chukwa license.txt and notice.txt. >>> > > The license files are updated, and restarting the voting process for >>> > > release candidate 1. With Chris's recommendation that we should >>> > > only submit source tarball for voting to reduce the work on license >>> > > issues on binary dependencies. >>> > > >>> > > The source tarball is available at: >>> > > >>> > > http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-rc1/ >>> > > >>> > > Documents are available at: >>> > > >>> > > http://people.apache.org/~eyang/chukwa-0.5.0-docs/ >>> > > >>> > > Please download, evaluate, and vote on this list. >>> > > Thanks >>> > > >>> > > regards, >>> > > Eric >>> > >>> >> >> >> >>-- >>Ahmed Fathalla >
