I would hope that Elizabeth I would not be relevant. She ran history's most
successful police state. "The spacious days of good Queen Bess" were extremely
repressive - and she got people to love it.
Jonathan Hayes
From: Richard M. Langworth <[email protected]>
To: ChurchillChat <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, September 16, 2016 12:58 AM
Subject: [ChurchillChat] Is Churchill Still Relevant?
On Thursday, September 15, 2016 at 11:00:20 PM UTC-4, Dave Turrell wrote:
Would anyone care to explain why WSC will be relevant to someone born in, say,
2000? More so than Gladstone, Walpole, or Elizabeth I?
A challenging question, Dave. But start with the attached. Somehow I don't see
Gladstone, Walpole or Bess making the cut. --
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"ChurchillChat" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/churchillchat.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"ChurchillChat" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/churchillchat.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
