[cia-drugs] Re: British special forces caught pretending to be Iraqi 'insurgents'

[norgesen]

--- In cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com, "David Guyatt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]...> wrote: > The important point that is being ignored here is that the Iraqi police turned over the two soldiers (prior to the rescue attempt at the prison) to the Shia militia.  In other words, the thrust of this article is altogether barking up the wrong tree.   ----   I don't think so. Who are the sources pointing to the "turnover to the Shia militia" & what might be their motives in pointing in that direction? This is a case where the special forces guys got caught doing the dirty deeds, and now the usual suspects are frantically spinning to turn our eyes away from the obvious.   n.   >>>> So what we have here is a clear instance of a foreign power attempting to fabricate a terrorist attack. Why else would the soldiers be dressed as Arabs if not to frame them? Why have a car laden with explosives if you don't plan to use them for destructive purposes? Iraq is headed towards civil war, and this operation was meant to accelerate the process by killing people and blaming others. Nothing more, nothing less. That the British army staged an over-the-top escape when it could rely on normal diplomatic channels to recover its people proves that. Such extreme methods highlight the need to keep secrets. There have been a number of insurgent bombings in Iraq recently. Who really is responsible for the bloodshed and destruction? The only tangible benefit of the bombings is justification for Coalition forces maintaining the peace in Iraq. Who benefits from that? Certainly not the Iraqis – they already believe most suicide bombings are done by the United States to prompt religious war. After reading about this incident, I'm not inclined to disagree. Even though this false-flag operation was blown wide open, I'm afraid it might still be used in the mainstream media to incite further violence in the Middle East. Judging by the coverage that has emerged after the incident, my fears seem warranted. Several articles have already turned the story against the angry Iraqis who fought the British tanks as they demolished the jail wall, painting them as aggressive Shia militia attacking the doe-eyed, innocent troops responding to the concern that their comrades were held by religious fanatics. A photograph of a troop on fire comes complete with commentary that the vehicles were under attack during a "bid to recover arrested servicemen" that were possibly undercover. All criminal elements of British treachery are downplayed, the car's explosive cache is never mentioned and the soldiers who instigated the affair are made victims of an unstable country they are defending. Hilariously, all of this spin has already landed Iran at the top of the blame game. Because when the war combine botches its own clandestine terrorist acts, what better way to recover than by painting the soulless, freedom-hating country you'd love to invade next as the culprit? In a way, I almost admire the nerve of officials who are able to infer that Basra's riots have nothing to do with fake insurgent bombing raids and everything to do with religious ties to a foreign country. It's a sheer unmitigated gall that flies in the face of logic and reason. "The Iranians are careful not to be caught," a British official said as the UK threatened to refer Iran to the UN Security Council for sanctions. Too bad the British aren't! Maybe then they'd be able to complete their black-ops mission without looking like complete fools in the process! Make no mistake – any and all violence to erupt from Basra over this incident lands squarely on the shoulders of the British army and its special forces. Instead of stoking the flames of propaganda against a nation it has no hope of ever conquering, maybe Britain should quit trying to intimidate the Iraqis with fear and torture and start focusing on fixing its mistakes and getting out of the Middle East. http://www.thesimon.com/magazine/articles/canon_fodder/0961_fake_terrorism_coalition_best_friend.html   --- In cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com, "David Guyatt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]...> wrote: > The important point that is being ignored here is that the Iraqi police turned over the two soldiers (prior to the rescue attempt at the prison) to the Shia militia.  In other words, the thrust of this article is altogether barking up the wrong tree.   >   ----- Original Message ----- >   From: E Bryant Holman >   To: cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com ; El Paso Greens ; 1zapatista >   Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 3:32 PM >   Subject: [cia-drugs] British special forces caught pretending to be Iraqi 'insurgents' > > >   British special forces caught pretending to be Iraqi 'insurgents' > >   http://www.theinsider.org/news/article.asp?id=1556 > >   the gig is up Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ Please let us stay on topic and be civil. OM SPONSORED LINKS United state bankruptcy court western district of texas United state life insurance United state patent United state patent search United states patent office United state flag YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS  Visit your group "cia-drugs" on the web.    To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]    Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.